Top Price Market
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

Top Price Market

Politics

Georgia court offers new explanation for ‘fictitious’ indictment posted before Trump charges

by August 16, 2023
August 16, 2023
Georgia court offers new explanation for ‘fictitious’ indictment posted before Trump charges

The Fulton County Clerk of Courts Office is offering a new explanation for the supposed ‘fictitious’ indictment posted on the Georgia court’s website before a grand jury voted Monday to hand up an indictment for former President Trump and 18 others.

On Monday afternoon, the Fulton County Court’s website posted a document that listed the same charges included in the indictment released late Monday night, which included charges of violating the Georgia RICO Act (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act), solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer, conspiracy to commit filing false documents and more.

Reuters first reported on the document before the Fulton County Court quickly removed it from the website and released a statement, blasting the document as ‘fictitious’ and warning the media ‘that documents that do not bear an official case number, filing date, and the name of The Clerk of Courts, in concert, are not considered official filings and should not be treated as such.’

The indictment was handed up and unsealed Monday night, bearing the same charges as listed on the alleged fictitious document, and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis was asked for an explanation.

‘No, I can’t tell you anything about what you refer to,’ Willis said. ‘What I can tell you is that we had a grand jury here in Fulton County. They deliberated till almost 8 o’clock, if not right after 8 o’clock, an indictment was returned. It was true billed. And you now have an indictment.’ 

But the fallout continued into the day Tuesday after Trump attorneys and allies blasted the system.

The court on Tuesday afternoon released a lengthy statement in an attempt to clear up questions.

‘The Office of the Fulton County Clerk of Superior and Magistrate Courts announces that midday on August 14, 2023, a media outlet utilizing the Fulton County Press que obtained a docket sheet and shared it with other media outlets who then released the sample working document related to the former United States President, Donald Trump – reporting that an indictment had been returned by the Special Grand Jury in Fulton County Georgia,’ the statement reads. ‘Upon learning of the mishap, Fulton County Clerk of Superior and Magistrate Courts, Ché Alexander, immediately removed the document and issued correspondence notifying the media that a fictitious document was in circulation and that no indictment had been returned by the Grand Jury.’

‘In anticipation of issues that arise with entering a potentially large indictment, Alexander used charges that pre-exist in Odyssey to test the system and conduct a trial run,’ the statement continues. ‘Unfortunately, the sample working document led to the docketing of what appeared to be an indictment, but which was, in fact, only a fictitious docket sheet.’

The court said that ‘because the media has access to documents before they are published, and while it may have appeared that something official had occurred because the document bore a case number and filing date, it did not include a signed ‘true’ or ‘no’ bill nor an official stamp with Clerk Alexander’s name, thereby making the document unofficial and a test sample only.’

‘Hours later, after receiving the True Bill presented to presiding Judge, Robert McBurney, Clerk Alexander executed the filing with a file stamp and moments later she made the filing public,’ the court continues. ‘The Office understands the confusion that this matter caused and the sensitivity of all court filings.’

The court said its remains ‘committed to operating with an extreme level of efficiency, accuracy, and transparency.’

‘Media members can expect to be notified of any/all filings in real time and will be provided access to filings via equitable communication,’ the court said.

It is still unclear why the ‘sample working document’ and the ‘fictitious docket sheet’ matched the exact charges brought against the former president and 18 others.

Fox News’ Claudia Kelly-Bazan contributed to this report.

Brooke Singman is a Fox News Digital politics reporter. You can reach her at Brooke.Singman@Fox.com or @BrookeSingman on Twitter.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
GOP erupts over 2018 text from Hunter Biden claiming he’d paid dad’s bills for ‘past 11 years’
next post
Construction Of Vanadium Electrolyte Manufacturing Facility Underway

You may also like

House Ethics Committee plans to discuss probe into...

Texas judge rules state’s abortion law is too...

House Republican rips ‘naivete’ of Biden admin’s $6B...

White House mum on whether Hunter Biden gave...

Vital Western alliance countries’ heavy dependence on China...

House Dems cross party lines, demand Biden admin...

‘Doesn’t matter’ which Democrat faces Trump in November,...

Biden admin officials noticed stamina issues in president’s...

US approves F-16 fighter jet sales to Turkey...

White House denies secret plot to oust Karine...

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Trump considers tax hike on Americans making $2.5 million or more per...

    • GOP senators: Congress should vote on Trump’s potential Iran nuclear deal

    • UnitedHealthcare sued by shareholders over reaction to CEO’s killing

    • RETRANSMISSION: Group Eleven to be Featured on Radius Research for a Live Company Pitch, Deep Dive and Q&A Webinar

    • Chief Justice Roberts doubles down on defense of courts as SCOTUS gears up to hear key Trump cases

    Categories

    • Business (1,631)
    • Investing (4,776)
    • Politics (7,542)
    • Uncategorized (2)
    • World (6,130)
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: toppricemarket.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 toppricemarket.com | All Rights Reserved


    Back To Top